According to @adam3us, most Bitcoin participants agree on the core mission, while disagreements center on which tactics will work best, especially complex low-level details and long-duration or second-order risks that are harder to understand and predict. Source: Adam Back on X, Sep 27, 2025. He states that debates involving figures such as Luke Dashjr, Michael Saylor, Jimmy Song, James Lavish, Pieter Wuille (sipa), Greg Maxwell, and protocol developers are driven by care for Bitcoin’s long-term robustness and ongoing maintenance and security work. Source: Adam Back on X, Sep 27, 2025. He adds that emphatic or snarky comments should be viewed as mission-driven context rather than disagreement over Bitcoin’s purpose, and that this framing is useful to remember when evaluating discussions. Source: Adam Back on X, Sep 27, 2025.